Assessing latent initiator based multiple healing in epoxy matrix GFRP laminated composites

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2020-07
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NITS
Abstract
The matrix of any structural materials typically consists of brittle polymer, which is susceptible to crack initiation and growth. To resist this flaw, the concept of self-healing is introduced. Present research work demonstrates a latent initiator based healing agent is used externally into the damage region to restore its original mechanical properties after healing followed by a strong covalent bond at the interface. Also, healing can be possible in the multi-step. In comparison to another healing approach, the healing efficiency of healed samples was found higher compared to the virgin sample. In order to achieve this objective, latent initiator based healing agent grafted silica nanoparticles were synthesized using the one-pot/sol-gel method (IFSs) and multi-step process/post-synthesis grafting method (IGSs). Further, the performance and healing ability IFSs and IGSs reinforced epoxy composites have been investigated. After detail investigations, the results concluded that IFSs/IGSs has no healing capability for the resistance of crack in the epoxy nanocomposites. Looking opportunity towards maximum healing efficiency with unaltered mechanical properties, imidazole as a suitable latent initiator based healing agent for extrinsic healing capabilities of IFSs/epoxy composites using have been investigated. After a successful demonstration towards enhancing the toughening and healing performance of nanocomposites, multiple healing capabilities of GFRPs laminated composites using the same healing agent have been investigated further. Initially, the effect of varying content of imidazole on tensile, flexural and hardness properties of epoxy nanocomposites was demonstrated. Composites (IENC-110) added with 10 wt. % of imidazole and 1 wt. % IFS showed maximum enhancement in tensile strength by 61 % (66 MPa) compare to NE (41 MPa) respectively. However, the tensile modulus is remained unchanged as compared to NE. For flexural properties, the significant enhancement in flexural strength and flexural modulus by ~96 % (102 MPa), and 15 % (2.83 GPa), respectively for IENC-15 composites was found. Similarly, the maximum enhancement in hardness for IENC-110 composites by 19 % (24.57 HV) was found as compared to that of NE (20.71 HV). Further, multiple fracture test of SENB was performed to evaluate fracture toughness and healing performance of epoxy nanocomposites. The results showed the maximum recovery in fracture toughness for IENC-110 composites by 67 % (1.17 MPa.m0.5) as compared to the virgin sample (0.70 MPa.m0.5) was achieved over 3rd number of healing cycles. However, the maximum healing efficiency for IENC-110 composites of 140 % due to critical peak loads while 167 % due to fracture toughness at the 3rd number of healing cycles was achieved. Finally, the appearances of hackel marks in the fracture surface under fractography analysis also justify the significant enhancement in surface roughness. Further, multiple healing capabilities of GFRPs laminated composites using the same healing agent have been investigated. The effect of varying content of imidazole on tensile, flexural and hardness properties of GFRPs composites was demonstrated. The maximum enhancement in tensile strength, tensile modulus, strain and modulus of the toughness of GFI-10 composites of ~34 % (~464 MPa), ~13 % (~6.80 GPa), ~13 % (~8.16 %) and ~64 % (~22 MJ.m-3) respectively were found. This is mainly ascribed to the formation of strong interface between the fiber and the matrix due to the addition of imidazole. Further, the optical micrograph of the tensile fracture surface of the virgin sample showed poor through-thickness delamination where the fibers are failed like a broom. In contrast, the addition of imidazole in epoxy/GFRPs composites restricts the through-thickness delamination and reduced the blooming effect with partial fiber breakages. For flexural properties, the maximum enhancement in flexural strength, flexural modulus, flexural strain and work of flexural of GFI-10 composites of ~34 % (~389 MPa), ~22 % (~19.70 GPa), ~100 % (~0.04 mm/mm) and ~72 % (~16.76 MJ.m-2) respectively were found. This attributed the formation of strong bonding between glass fiber and matrix due to sustaining the more flexural stress. Similarly, for hardness properties, the maximum enhancement in the hardness of composite (IEGF-110) added with 10 wt. % of imidazole and 1 wt. % of IFS of 21 % (74.44 HV) was found. This may be attributed to the high packing density of the final network. Further, multiple fracture test of DCB was performed to evaluate fracture energy and healing performance of GFRPs composites. The results demonstrate a maximum recovery in fracture energy for GFI-10 composites by 83 % (1.87 kJ/m2) as compare to the virgin (0.37 kJ/m2) over 12th healing cycles. It suggests that healing with excess (10 wt. %) imidazole with respect to epoxy within the delamination surface increases the number of bonds that bounds the delaminated surfaces strongly during the repetitive healing. However, the maximum healing efficiency for GFI-10 composites of 154 % due to critical peak loads while 182 % due to fracture toughness at 12th number of healing cycles was achieved. Finally, the optical micrograph of the mid fracture surface of DCB samples showed the relatively rough fractures surface because of fiber bridging and fiber pull-out for GFI-10. Thus, the capability of imidazole to restrict the damage in FRPs composites is evident from the fractography investigation. This work successfully demonstrates the capability of imidazole introduce healing capability in GFRPs.
Description
Keywords
Citation